[minutes] June 15 teleconference

Hi,

My notes from our call today available below. Next call on June 29.

Action items:
* ACTION: Dom to figure out what kind of patent licensing are needed for
the wireframe project (based on Tony's concerns)
* ACTION: David to reserve webauthn.how for "practical webauthn" [DONE]
* ACTION: Nick to work with Matt on a design document for managing
backend hosting
ACTION: Nick to bring up UX resources/guidance for Practical WebAuthn
* ACTION: Dom to set up a slack channel for the CG

----
Present: Dom, Anthony_Nadalin, David_Turner, Luke_Walker,
Matthew_Miller, Andrew_Shikiar, Nick_Stelle, Alex_Seigler, John_Fontana,
Nick_Mooney, Bart_de_Water

Nick: I've looked into webauthn.guide - doesn't look like we can
transfer that one
... there are other TLDs available, .help or .how
... Luke, any news on .dev?

Luke: same as for .guide at this point

# Wireframe project

Nick: Tony in the WebAuthn WG meeting mentioned discussions around
licensing/IPR if this group is shared between FIDO/W3C

Tony: want to make sure the contributions made to a Web site gets made
under the W3C CG CLA

ACTION: Dom to figure out what kind of patent licensing are needed for
the wireframe project (understand Tony's concerns)

Matthew: are we talking about making patent licensing for contributions
to the wireframe repo?

Dom: hope not, but need to clarify this

Nick: hope we don't need that

John: useful to double check

Nick: any inspiration on the name for the project/org?

Matthew: practical-webauthn

Dom: I like it

Nick: me too
  repo was created for the wireframe project

Andrew: it's fine - sounds appropriate for developers

Matthew: howto-dot-webauthn-dot-dev

John: webauthn-dot-how sounds neat and tidy

ACTION: David to reserve webauthn.how for "practical webauthn"

Nick: was imagining starting with a set of static pages generated via hugo

David: FIDO can host the web site

Nick: hopefully this can be updated via GH pushes

Matthew: you could use github actions for this
  what kind of site are we talking about?

Nick: similar to todomvc landing page

Matthew: there is hosting the landing page, but also hosting the backend
of the wireframe projects - how are we planning to deal with this?

Nick: not clear yet

David: so this would be hosting the various backends of the wireframe
projects?

Nick: if we host attestations, we need something like this

Luke: I agree this would needs to be end-to-end implementations (per
Bart's description)
  could be a list of showcases
  there are various options we could go

Matthew: maybe the backend side of things is not hosted, available for
download for testing

David: re hosting, we had not been thinking of hosting live services -
we need to think some more about that aspect

Matthew: I can imagine the security concerns - maybe let's instead
figure out a sane way to get https for local development; e.g. I use a
subdomain

Nick: there are various ways; we could provide a docker/container with
certbot

Matthew: we could have a pre-defined DNS entry for localhost to help
with that
  integrating the backend in the project is useful given what we want to
demonstrate (e.g. on user management)

ACTION: Nick to work with Matt on a design document for managing backend
hosting

Bart's notes
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn-adoption/2020Jun/0007.html

Bart: someone mentioned having access to UX designers?

Nick: I do - I'll schedule some time with them, and one of the UX
designers from my team will be joining the CG

Bart: that'd be useful to get started

ACTION: Nick to bring up UX guidance for Practical WebAuthn

# Community
Matthew: do we want to set up any kind of community forum to chat real-time?

ACTION: Dom to set up a slack channel for the CG

Received on Monday, 15 June 2020 17:40:44 UTC