- From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:26:41 +0200
- To: John Gardner <gardnerjohng@gmail.com>
- Cc: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>, public-webassembly@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADjR9NqKx59LYnsUPXzBPaHqX4VD5ogF11N652rCPy=c3FcSgw@mail.gmail.com>
On 22 June 2017 at 12:26, John Gardner <gardnerjohng@gmail.com> wrote: > Should these keywords only be highlighted as such when they're matched at > the start of an S-expression? > Their keyword status does not dependent on context, so I would highlight them anywhere. You might also be interested in the draft specification of the lexical syntax, which gives a few more details: https://webassembly.github.io/spec/text/lexical.html And actually, I just see that the definition of `keyword` there is bogus as written. :) On 22 June 2017 at 17:38, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com> wrote: > >> Nice! Some observations: >> >> - most module-level keywords seem to be missing, e.g., `global`, >> `memory`, `table`, `import`, `export` and more >> - `clz`, `ctz`, `popcnt` are int-only >> - `lt` is float-only >> - block comments can nest, but I suspect the highlighting mechanism won't >> be able to handle that? >> >> You can peek at the definition of the lexical grammar in the reference >> interpreter for regexps and a complete list of tokens: >> >> https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/blob/master/interpreter/ >> text/lexer.mll#L91 >> >> /Andreas >> >> >> >> On 22 June 2017 at 07:03, John Gardner <gardnerjohng@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> GitHub limits filetype recognition to text-based formats only, meaning >>> binary files are skipped when calculating a repository's usage statistics. >>> So it would've been pointless to include .wasm as a recognised >>> extension. >>> >>> >>> On 22 June 2017 at 14:44, Wink Saville <wink@saville.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Did you consider tracking .wasm files, the binary format for .wast? It >>>> should be fairly easy to incorporate wasm2wast to convert .wasm -> .wast on >>>> the fly? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:14 PM John Gardner <gardnerjohng@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello! >>>>> >>>>> I meant to give a heads up nearly a month ago, but better late than >>>>> never... Just to inform you all that WebAssembly will soon be >>>>> formally classified on GitHub >>>>> <https://github.com/github/linguist/pull/3650>. >>>>> >>>>> This has two (admittedly superficial) benefits: >>>>> >>>>> 1. It will now be possible to search for "WebAssembly" repos on >>>>> GitHub, which should also facilitate gauging the language's in-the-wild use >>>>> (at least as far as .wast and .wat files are concerned). >>>>> 2. .wast and .wat files will now receive syntax highlighting using >>>>> a language-grammar hand-written >>>>> <https://github.com/Alhadis/language-webassembly> by yours truly. >>>>> >>>>> If there are any corrections or updates that should be made to the >>>>> grammar's highlighting, please file an issue and I'll fix it as soon as >>>>> possible. =) >>>>> >>>>> (The changes will be live on GitHub with the next release of Linguist >>>>> <https://github.com/github/linguist>. We don't have a concrete >>>>> release schedule, but it generally happens every few weeks or so...) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> - John / @Alhadis <http://github.com/Alhadis> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 12:27:43 UTC