RE: Manifest Comparison

Thanks !! Good comments !! 

I think it needs to include in the future update. 

I think we need to consider also including this specification. 

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/app-manifest/raw-file/tip/index.html  

Best Regards, 

--- Jonathan Jeon

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Wilson [mailto:scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 12:50 AM
To: Koichi Takagi
Cc: 傈辆全; public-webappstore@w3.org
Subject: Re: Manifest Comparison

Thanks!

Some notes:

1. Basic: W3C has a version attribute
2. Language: W3C has a defaultLocale attribute; most elements in the manifest are localised, as is the content 3. View Type: W3C has width and height attributes, and there is also the ViewModes spec 4. "Approval" (not sure why its called that): Param is a property of a feature 5. Policy: W3C WARP is the spec here, with the <access> element

I also produced a (now outdated) comparison of W3C and OpenSocial comparison. However, in terms of stores and marketplaces, Apache Rave supports both, as do several stores it works with, as the discovery metadata is pretty much identical.

There also some utllities out there that can convert various web widgets (e.g. netvibes, old style Opera widgets) to W3C.

On 28 Feb 2013, at 14:37, Koichi Takagi wrote:

> Hi Scott,
> 
> you may find it in [1].
> 
> And I think
> "Mozilla App Store" means "Firefox Marketplace".
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/webappstore/wiki/Manifest

> 
> Koichi
> 
> 
>> Hi Jonathan,
>> 
>> I can't see it - do you have a URL for it?
>> 
>> S
>> 
>> On 28 Feb 2013, at 06:19, 傈辆全 wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 	Dear All,
>> 
>> 	This is a draft comparison table for the Manifest in the Web Stores.
>> 	(It compares three types of manifest format : W3C Widget, Mozilla 
>> App Store, Chrome Store)
>> 
>> 	I hope it could be a good starting point for standardized manifest 
>> format on the open web store environment.
>> 
>> 	If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know that.
>> 
>> 	Best Regards,
>> 
>> 	--- Jonathan Jeon
>> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 09:41:03 UTC