Re: Manifest Comparison

On 28 February 2013 16:49, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> Some notes:
>
> 1. Basic: W3C has a version attribute
> 2. Language: W3C has a defaultLocale attribute; most elements in the
> manifest are localised, as is the content
> 3. View Type: W3C has width and height attributes, and there is also the
> ViewModes spec
> 4. "Approval" (not sure why its called that): Param is a property of a
> feature
> 5. Policy: W3C WARP is the spec here, with the <access> element
>
> I also produced a (now outdated) comparison of W3C and OpenSocial
> comparison. However, in terms of stores and marketplaces, Apache Rave
> supports both, as do several stores it works with, as the discovery
> metadata is pretty much identical.
>
> There also some utllities out there that can convert various web widgets
> (e.g. netvibes, old style Opera widgets) to W3C.
>

Looks great!  Is there a field for app "ID"?


>
> On 28 Feb 2013, at 14:37, Koichi Takagi wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > you may find it in [1].
> >
> > And I think
> > "Mozilla App Store" means "Firefox Marketplace".
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/webappstore/wiki/Manifest
> >
> > Koichi
> >
> >
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >>
> >> I can't see it - do you have a URL for it?
> >>
> >> S
> >>
> >> On 28 Feb 2013, at 06:19, 전종홍 wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>      Dear All,
> >>
> >>      This is a draft comparison table for the Manifest in the Web
> Stores.
> >>      (It compares three types of manifest format : W3C Widget, Mozilla
> >> App Store, Chrome Store)
> >>
> >>      I hope it could be a good starting point for standardized manifest
> >> format on the open web store environment.
> >>
> >>      If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know that.
> >>
> >>      Best Regards,
> >>
> >>      --- Jonathan Jeon
> >>
> >
> >
>
>