Re: FW: Split application manifest outside of the runtime spec

Hi Jonathan,



I agree, during the WAC initiative we addressed various roles that the manifest can have as a container for attributes related to app distribution. It might be good to start a use case list, and then see what should be core features and what could be implemented via extensions.



Thanks,

Bryan Sullivan, Service Standards | at&t





------ Original message------

From: 전종홍

Date: Sun, 4/21/2013 5:28 PM

To: public-webappstore@w3.org;

Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org;

Subject:FW: Split application manifest outside of the runtime spec



Hi All,

Development of Manifest specification is started on W3C sysapps WG.
http://manifest.sysapps.org/


I think that the manifest specification would be most important spec for web app store also.

I hope we can make collaborations between web app store CG and sysapps WG.

Please give us your comments and contributions.

Best Regards,

--- Jonathan Jeon

-----Original Message-----
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 4:42 AM
To: public-sysapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Split application manifest outside of the runtime spec


Hi All,
The repo for the manifest is now at the link below. Please subscribe yourself if you want to be a reviewer:
https://github.com/sysapps/manifest



On the Webs, you can access the manifest at:
http://manifest.sysapps.org/


(Please note that the spec sections will be getting some reshuffles over the next week … it's a bit of a mess ATM, but hope to get it under control soon. Pull requests, questions, bugs, etc. all welcomed!)

Kind regards,
Marcos

--
Marcos Caceres


On Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:

> For those not tracking GH, we recently merged in a draft rewrite of the manifest format (see section 3):
> http://runtime.sysapps.org/#application-manifest-and-its-members

>
> It now defines some of the processing rules + i18n model.
>
> We currently have a proposal in GH to split the application manifest from the runtime spec [1] (IIRC, we also discussed this briefly during the F2F).
>
> Are there any objections to splitting the manifest format into its own
> specification? Words of support would be appreciated.
>
> [1] https://github.com/sysapps/runtime/issues/76

>
> --
> Marcos Caceres