- From: <sleazydude@freenet.de>
- Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 10:24:22 +0200
- To: public-webappscp@w3.org
- Message-Id: <e0f009dff6a726367820c67a6bdb0255@email.freenet.de>
Dear Sir/Madam, Thinking about lobbyists, standards, latest agencyscandals and Drive-By-Attacks in the light of new features in the HTML5-Standard(EME) has led me to your site. I find it interesting that a community-group was created for this type of problem. After all Standards should not only be open but also promote openness. Problems with Code-Protection should be delt with otherwise. Like it has been done many times before(obfuscators, etc.) at the domain-level of the application, not in the standard. e.g. You are listing Firefox OS as an example. It might thrive on HTML, but Mozilla can implement a CRM-Module for their own OS, they do not need a standard for that. My questions are: What are the reasons for source-code-protection to be in the browser?(soundcloud.com already proved it that it can protect it's content from the main script-kiddies without such a standard, and there are also "pay-walls", these 2 in compination with the blacklisting of a member when attempting to circumvent it are a good match I think) Is there a list of Organizations and Persons funding this research, because this specific group is currently not listed, it seems (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/nmfunds). Sincerely ThomasP.s.:I have to appologize for my email-alias, the one I intended to use was locked down, by MS because I haven't used it in years. --- Alle Postfächer an einem Ort. Jetzt wechseln und E-Mail-Adresse mitnehmen! Rundum glücklich mit freenetMail
Received on Sunday, 6 October 2013 19:59:44 UTC