Purpose of your Group(Web App Source Code Protection Community Group)?

Dear Sir/Madam, 
 
Thinking about lobbyists, standards, latest agencyscandals and  Drive-By-Attacks in the light of new features in the HTML5-Standard(EME) 
has led me to your site. 
I find it interesting that a community-group was created for this type  of problem. 
After all Standards should not only be open but also promote openness. 
 
Problems with Code-Protection should be delt with otherwise. 
 
Like it has been done many times before(obfuscators, etc.) at the  domain-level of the application, not in the standard. 
 
e.g. You are listing Firefox OS as an example. 
It might thrive on HTML, but Mozilla can implement a CRM-Module for  their own OS, they do not need a standard for that. 
 
My questions are: 
What are the reasons for source-code-protection to be in the  browser?(soundcloud.com already proved it that it can protect it's  content from the main script-kiddies without such a standard, and there  are also "pay-walls", these 2 in compination with the blacklisting of a  member when attempting to circumvent it are a good match I think) 
Is there a list of Organizations and Persons funding this research,  because this specific group is currently not listed, it seems  (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/nmfunds). 
 
Sincerely 
 
ThomasP.s.:I have to appologize for my email-alias, the one I intended to use was locked down, by MS because I haven't used it in years.

---
Alle Postfächer an einem Ort. Jetzt wechseln und E-Mail-Adresse mitnehmen! Rundum glücklich mit freenetMail

Received on Sunday, 6 October 2013 19:59:44 UTC