- From: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:45:06 +0200
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
On 02/13/2018 05:39 PM, Travis Leithead wrote: > I believe CE has been merged into WHATWG HTML for over a year now, so this shouldn't be a problem. lovely, and I've been reading http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/ since it says "W3C Editor's Draft 08 February 2018" > > -----Original Message----- > From: Olli Pettay [mailto:olli@pettay.fi] > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 6:24 AM > To: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>; public-webapps@w3.org; Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> > Subject: Re: CfC: Incorporate Custom Elements into HTML > > Domenic, > > is the plan to merge Custom Elements also to WhatWG HTML spec? If so, then this is fine. > But it is not ok to have CE in W3C HTML spec only and not anywhere else. > > > -Olli > > > On 02/13/2018 03:05 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote: >> There is an open Call for Consensus to incorporate Custom Elements directly into the HTMl specification: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/1209 >> >> Replies are requested by end of day, 2018-02-20 >> >> Positive response is preferred, silence will be taken as concurring with the outcome. >> >> The rationales are: >> - There has been no work on the Custom Elements specification for over a year >> - It is largely framed as a series of "monkey patches" on HTML anyway >> - We have a commitment from the HTML editorial team to undertake the work in the HTML 5.3 timeline >> >> There are also now two implementations of Custom Elements, meaning 5.3 is the appropriate timeline to get this work into the HTML Recommendation. >> >> cheers >> >> Chaals >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2018 15:50:53 UTC