- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:44:03 +0200
- To: "Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping)" <jackiszhp@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Jack (Zhan, Hua Ping) <jackiszhp@gmail.com> wrote: > I feel the point I want to make is simple, but I found that people can > not understand me. Is it because the words such as “stupid” drag > people off the road to point I want to make? Originally, I thought as > long as I raised the question, you smart guys could right the wrong, > and I do not have to spend time on this. It certainly doesn't help that you repeatedly violated https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/ and continue to use sexist language: https://notapattern.net/2014/10/14/ways-men-in-tech-are-unintentionally-sexist/. Furthermore, despite multiple people having given you helpful references as to why you're wrong about the same-origin policy you continue to insist that instead everyone else is wrong, as well as a standard adopted by four independent browsers engines and many many websites. You ask everyone else to go in depth, but you haven't really refuted any of the points and articles brought forward. I'll try one more time, pointing you to https://annevankesteren.nl/2015/02/same-origin-policy, which hopefully illustrates to you why 1st should not be allowed to access 2nd beyond the extend that it can for legacy reasons. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:44:29 UTC