- From: Feross Aboukhadijeh <feross@feross.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:41:15 -0700
- To: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+nRABnPq=9C5QRULCKte3aWAJQie-tCMMMy-ZXUR1A3Tut6Qw@mail.gmail.com>
Looks like there is also https://github.com/wicg/writable-files -- this looks quite nice! What's the status of that spec? Feross Blog <http://feross.org/> | WebTorrent <https://webtorrent.io/> | Study Notes <https://www.apstudynotes.org/> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Feross Aboukhadijeh <feross@feross.org> wrote: > The web really needs a proper filesystem to properly compete with native > apps. I'd love to make WebTorrent (https://webtorrent.io) use the disk > instead of in-memory storage, but there's no clear cross-browser solution. > So, in the meantime, torrent data is stored in memory and lost when the > user navigates to another page. > > Is there an active effort to make this happen? These are the specs I'm > currently aware of: > > 1. File API (https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/): widely implemented, 92% > support > 2. File API (Directories and System) (https://www.w3.org/TR/file- > system-api/): Chrome only, deprecated, 51% support > 3. FileSystem API (http://w3c.github.io/filesystem-api/): Meant to > replace previous deprecated effort, Browser support unclear, spec status > unclear to me > > Spec #1 is quite good, but it doesn't spec an entire filesystem. Spec #2 > would have been sufficient for our use case, but is deprecated. Spec #3 > seems like the best hope. Is that being worked on? > > Feross > Blog <http://feross.org/> | WebTorrent <https://webtorrent.io/> | Study > Notes <https://www.apstudynotes.org/> >
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 04:42:24 UTC