W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Indexed DB Transactions vs. Microtasks

From: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:43:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEvLGc+W6uBOu2DZ8Rx0Js4ySvZBtsp2b_-iMHSkCaZNjBV7wA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Domenic Denicola <
domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:

> [+Yehuda, +Raf]
> From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jonas@sicking.cc]
> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Adam Klein <adamk@google.com> wrote:
> >> While I agree that the original microtask intent would suggest we
> >> change this, and I concur that it seems unlikely to break content, I
> >> worry about the spec and implementation complexity that would be
> >> incurred by having to support the notion of "at the end of the current
> >> microtask". It suggests one
> >> of:
> >>
> >> 1. A new task queue, which runs after microtasks (nanotasks?) 2. The
> >> ability to put tasks at the start of the microtask queue rather than
> >> at the end
> >
> > I was just thinking to hardcode this into the algorithm that's run at
> the end of the microtask. Note that closing the transaction never runs
> code, which means that very little implementation complexity is needed.
> > I definitely agree that both of the above options are pretty
> unattractive.
> This recalls Yehuda's proposal for a "bucketed" microtask queue. It seems
> like this is a very strong argument for it.

This seems orthogonal to bucketing. The IDB transaction deactivation step
isn't a sort of work that we'd want to bucket (as I argued in my previous
message, treating this IDB work as a task leads down some bad roads); as
Jonas says, we would actually want to hardcode it as a thing that "just
happens" after each microtask is run (an idea that would have unappealing
consequences for the Chromium implementation of microtasks, but one which
I'll mull over).

- Adam
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 05:44:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:25 UTC