W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Custom-elements: document.registerPolyfillElement ?

From: Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:00:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHnmYQ_gWJoE_c7+vJTYkt2qFCcgQJ1QbXRGUSsbb4bRFSJJtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brett Zamir <brettz9@gmail.com>
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Brett Zamir <brettz9@gmail.com> wrote:

>  I was looking to make a genuine polyfill for <dialog> (not just a shim),
> and I found Polymer's CustomElements helpful, but realized too late that
> the spec required "x-" prefixes.
> I still feel like it would be useful to have a means for polyfills to be
> built according to well-recognized semantics via a standard extension
> mechanism.

It is possible to do this using a "type extension". For example:

document.register('x-polyfill-dialog', {prototype: ..., extends: 'dialog'})

This produces a type extension of the HTMLUnknownElement with the tag name
"dialog" in browsers that don't support dialog, and a type extension of the
HTMLDialogElement of ones that do.

The only wrinkle is that markup must use <dialog is="x-polyfill-dialog">.

Your polyfill can degrade gracefully in whichever way you decide. For
example, you could detect HTMLDialogElement and not register the Custom
Element, in which case the markup will create unresolved type extensions of
HTMLDialogElement that get the browser's native dialog. Or you could go
ahead and register your polyfill anyway, in which case your prototype
object would hide the browser's HTMLDialogElement prototype. Or you could
do something dynamic inbetween.


Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 06:00:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:25 UTC