W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Fetch API

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:28:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78iysBX-kA4e=55bbLQWT8dZYkRK_qGzvSTnD9W=QR=wyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Cc: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com> wrote:
> For XHR.send(), we've finally chosen to accept only ArrayBufferView.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0141.html
> Do we want to do the same for FetchBody body of RequestInit?

What I really want is for IDL to be fixed as technically we cannot
mention ArrayBuffer and ArrayBufferView in IDL as they are not
IDL-defined constructs:

I'd like something in IDL where I can just say "this accepts bytes"
and "I want to return bytes", and IDL handles the complexities and
ensures all APIs are compatible on this. What we did for
XMLHttpRequest was probably a mistake as we could not make it an
overarching policy.

Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 07:29:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:24 UTC