Re: Fetch API

On 3 June 2014 16:50, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Domenic Denicola
> <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
>
> - I like HeaderMap a lot, but for construction purposes, I wonder if a
> shorthand for the usual case could be provided. E.g. it would be nice to be
> able to do
> >
> > fetch("http://example.com", {
> >   headers: {
> >     "X-Foo": "Bar"
> >   }
> > });
> >
> > instead of, assuming a constructor is added,
> >
> > fetch("http://example.com", {
> >   headers: new HeaderMap([
> >     ["X-Foo", "Bar"]
> >   ])
> > });
>
> Yeah, it's not clear to me what is best here. An object whose keys are
> ByteString and values are either ByteString or a sequence of
> ByteString? I agree that we want this.


I vote ByteString: ByteString. If you want something more complicated,
provide a HeaderMap or mutate after construction.