W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

[Bug 25830] [Custom]: Constructor function name is illegal by definition.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:48:12 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-25830-2927-pZ87EW6lFH@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25830

Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |arv@google.com
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #8 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to johnjbarton from comment #7)
> What value does the spec say the constructor function name should have?

Now, that's a good question. Can it be anonymous function?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 17:48:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:24 UTC