- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:46:57 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25813
Bug ID: 25813
Summary: [Custom]: Throw Exception when EXTENDS and PROTOTYPE
have a mismatch
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Component Model
Assignee: dglazkov@chromium.org
Reporter: dfreedm@google.com
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
Blocks: 14968
Given the current spec language, it is possible to construct an element that
claims to extend from something like HTMLButtonElement, but does not have one
in the prototype.
Example:
document.registerElement('not-input', {
extends: 'input',
prototype: HTMLElement.prototype
});
Elements like this will be a footgun, as they will appear to be regular type
extension elements, but will be missing expected API and IDL properties (in UAs
that implement IDL in prototype).
I think the spec should say that UAs should throw at the registration of such a
frankenstien's monster of an element and spare developers and users from having
to double check prototypes of type extensions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 19:46:59 UTC