- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 15:17:01 +0200
- To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
I'm still trying to grasp the philosophy behind shadow trees. Sometimes it's explained as "exposing the primitives" but the more I learn (rather slowly, this time at BlinkOn) the more it looks like a bunch of new primitives. We cannot explain <input> still, but since we allow going inside the shadow tree we now see the need for a composed tree walker (a way to iterate over a tree including its non-encapsulated interleaved shadow trees). In addition we see the need for a composed range of sorts, so selection across boundaries makes sense. Neither of these are really needed to explain bits of the existing platform. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 13:17:28 UTC