- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:04:23 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24288 William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |wchen@mozilla.com Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #2 from William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com> --- Reverting the (In reply to Hayato Ito from comment #0) > It might be better to revert it to the old behavior until we find a > reasonable idea of the implementation. The behavior of the fix is not forward compatible with the behavior in bug 22344. > We preserve the usage of child > elements of the <shadow> elements for the future, such as enabling new > behavior later again. So we wouldn't be able to do this. ^ If the intention is strip functionality until you figure out a way to reasonably implement the <shadow> as a function call, then you'll also have to neuter <content> insertion points in older shadows. Which means bringing back: "Let POOL be an empty ordered list." in https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/61745e0b40c8d609ad1070e7babc7915fca637ea -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 19:04:25 UTC