Re: Starting work on Indexed DB v2 spec - feedback wanted

I don't see it on the wiki, so resuggesting storing blobs with partial 
blobs, as discussed here



Le 16/04/2014 20:49, Joshua Bell a écrit :
> At the April 2014 WebApps WG F2F [1] there was general agreement that 
> moving forward with an Indexed Database "v2" spec was a good idea. Ali 
> Alabbas (Microsoft) has volunteered to co-edit the spec with me. 
> Maintaining compatibility is the highest priority; this will not break 
> the existing API.
> We've been tracking additional features for quite some time now, both 
> on the wiki [2] and bug tracker [3]. Several are very straightforward 
> (continuePrimaryKey, batch gets, binary keys, ...) and have already 
> been implemented in some user agents, and it will be helpful to 
> document these. Others proposals (URLs, Promises, full text search, 
> ...) are much more complex and will require additional implementation 
> feedback; we plan to add features to the v2 spec based on implementer 
> acceptance.
> This is an informal call for feedback to implementers on what is 
> missing from v1:
> * What features and functionality do you see as important to include?
> * How would you prioritize the features?
> If there's anything you think is missing from the wiki [2], or want to 
> comment on the importance of a particular feature, please call it out 
> - replying here is great. This will help implementers decide what work 
> to prioritize, which will drive the spec work. We'd also like to keep 
> the v2 cycle shorter than the v1 cycle was, so timely feedback is 
> appreciated - there's always room for a "v3".
> [1]
> [2]
> [3] 
> PS: Big thanks to Zhiqiang Zhang for his Indexed DB implementation 
> report, also presented at the F2F.

Peersm :
node-Tor :
GitHub :

Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 13:14:53 UTC