W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: [April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline April 9

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 21:19:34 +0300
Message-ID: <53458F36.30801@helsinki.fi>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Zhiqiang Zhang <zhiqiang.zhang@intel.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 04/09/2014 09:10 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 4/9/14 10:19 AM, ext Zhang, Zhiqiang wrote:
>>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>>> * IDB: Zhiqiang; test suite status; plan to create an Implementation Report
>> I've reviewed the open pull requests and moved all tests into https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/IndexedDB. And ran the tests on
>> Chrome and Firefox in http://w3c-test.org/tools/runner/index.html (/IndexedDB/ as path), to get an initial implementation report
>> http://zqzhang.github.io/IndexedDB-test/
>> Though we've gotten a test suite for IDB, it is not yet completed; at least we can do the following as I observed:
>> - improve support.js as comment https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/516#issuecomment-39178659
>> - add more tests, for example, some of the checkpoints for exception are valuable in https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/292
>> - revisit the failed tests and provide fixing in need
>> - add test results of IE11; is there someone can help on this?
> Thanks for this information Zhiqiang and for creating a Draft Implementation Report for IDB!
> (If no none volunteers to provide IE data before this week's meeting, we can ask Adrian and Kris during the meeting.)
>>> * Server-sent Events: Zhiqiang; is the implementation report current
>>> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ServerSentEvents>; when do
>>> you
>>> expect the CR exit criteria to be met?
>> Yes, with one update that request-credentials.htm passed on Chrome and Firefox with fixing https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/836
>> applied; however, this fixing is not so perfect.
> Simon - would you (or someone else) please review <http://w3c-test.org/eventsource/request-credentials.htm> vis--vis PR836 (without this patch, this
> test case produces Timeout on Chrome, FFNightly and Opera)?
>> Another, I'd like to ask Mozilla experts to double check if the shared and dedicated worker are supported on Firefox as below tests or if there are
>> bugs in the tests themselves; can someone help on this?
>> - http://w3c-test.org/eventsource/dedicated-worker/
>> - http://w3c-test.org/eventsource/shared-worker/
> My recollection is that during the TPAC2013 meeting, Jonas said that functionality was implemented so yes, it would be good if someone would please
> clarify the situation and plan.

Gecko doesn't have EventSource in DedicatedWorker nor in SharedWorker


> -Thanks, AB
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2014 18:20:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:24 UTC