RE: [April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline April 9

Hi Art,

> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 7:12 PM
> To: Zhang, Zhiqiang; Travis Leithead; Alex Kuang; Kris Krueger; Vincent Scheib;
> Simon Pieters; Philippe Le Hégaret; Cameron McCormack
> Cc: public-webapps
> Subject: [April2014Meeting] Plans and expectations for specs in CR; deadline
> April 9
> 
> [ Bcc: public-webapps-testsuite ]
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> WebApps currently has 7 specs in CR, and 4 of them have at least one
> Draft implementation report [Interop]. In preparation for the upcoming
> meeting, I would appreciate if by April 9 the Test Facilitators these
> CRs would please provide a short status, plans, expectations and such
> for their test suites [Tests]:
> 
> * IDB: Zhiqiang; test suite status; plan to create an Implementation Report

I've reviewed the open pull requests and moved all tests into https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/IndexedDB. And ran the tests on Chrome and Firefox in http://w3c-test.org/tools/runner/index.html (/IndexedDB/ as path), to get an initial implementation report http://zqzhang.github.io/IndexedDB-test/

Though we've gotten a test suite for IDB, it is not yet completed; at least we can do the following as I observed:
- improve support.js as comment https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/516#issuecomment-39178659
- add more tests, for example, some of the checkpoints for exception are valuable in https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/292
- revisit the failed tests and provide fixing in need
- add test results of IE11; is there someone can help on this?

> * Pointer Lock: Vincent; implementation status; test suite status; plan
> to "complete" test suite
> 
> * Server-sent Events: Zhiqiang; is the implementation report current
> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ServerSentEvents>; when do
> you
> expect the CR exit criteria to be met?

Yes, with one update that request-credentials.htm passed on Chrome and Firefox with fixing https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/836 applied; however, this fixing is not so perfect.

Another, I'd like to ask Mozilla experts to double check if the shared and dedicated worker are supported on Firefox as below tests or if there are bugs in the tests themselves; can someone help on this?

- http://w3c-test.org/eventsource/dedicated-worker/
- http://w3c-test.org/eventsource/shared-worker/

Thanks,
Zhiqiang

> 
> * Web IDL: Travis; test suite status and plans; implementation status.
> Cam - what is the plan and expectation to move v1 back to LCWD; what are
> the high priority contentious issues/bugs?
> 
> * Web Messaging; Alex; test suite status; is there a `newer`
> implementation report
> than<http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebMessaging>; when do
> you
> expect the CR exit criteria to be met
> 
> * Web Sockets; Kris; test suite status; is there a `newer`
> implementation report than
> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebSockets>; when do you
> expect
> the CR exit criteria to be met
> 
> * Web Workers; Simon; test suite status; is there a `newer`
> implementation report than
> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebWorkers>; when do you
> expect
> the CR exit criteria to be met
> 
> Also, if any of the [PubStatus] Testing data for these specs is wrong or
> incomplete, please update the wiki directly or provide the updates that
> need to be made.
> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> [Tests] <http://w3c-test.org/>
> [Interop] <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/>
> [PubStatus] <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus>
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2014 17:26:32 UTC