- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 22:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 April 2014 22:38:09 UTC
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Marcos Caceres wrote: > On March 20, 2014 at 2:30:55 PM, Marcos Caceres (w3c@marcosc.com) wrote: > > On March 20, 2014 at 12:58:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > > Agreed. The exact target isn't very important here, and so being > > > consistent with legacy event firing for the same system is probably > > > a good idea. > > > > Agree. Let's go with consistency, even though it feels a bit weird. > > Ian, would it be possible to have some kind of hook in HTML to give us > this behaviour for free? > > That is, given an event handler IDL attribute on some interface, we get > the HTML attribute equivalent on body element (all wired up and ready to > be used). That would be useful in that we wouldn't need to define the > HTML onorientationchange attribute in the Orientation Lock spec (and all > future specs). This could really help with consistency. I'm very happy to add any such attributes to the HTML spec, just file a bug once you're confident that it won't change. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 7 April 2014 22:38:09 UTC