Re: New manifest spec - ready for FPWD?

On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Marcos Caceres < (> wrote:
> > The Editors would appreciate if people take a look and see if you agree with the feature set.
> What I think we should have is something like:
> "chrome": {
> "back": true
> }
> If the UA doesn't support any of the properties in the "chrome"
> section, then the UA should be required to not launch the app in
> standalone mode.

Captured here: 
> I also think the "dont-share-cookies-and-stuff" thing needs more work
> before it's ready for inclusion. So might be better to drop that for
> FPWD. But I'm fine with keeping it in for now too and dropping it if
> we can't solidify it.

This is has been removed from the spec. 

Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 03:54:30 UTC