- From: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:20:20 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 12/12/13 16:20, James Graham wrote: > On 12/12/13 15:13, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 12/11/13 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> [IR] <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebWorkers> >> >> Looking at this link, there are passes marked for obviously incorrect >> tests (e.g. see https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24077 >> which says that >> http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/workers/interfaces/DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope/postMessage/second-argument-null.html >> >> should fail in any conformant UA, but it's marked as passing in Opera >> and Chrome. >> >> So presumably we will need to rerun the tests in all UAs again once all >> the bugs have been fixed, yes? > > Yes. I have found another couple of trivial bugs in the tests which I > will fix up. I will also have a got at fixing Ms2ger's test runner to > work in a better way, sort out some way to automate the visual output, > and hopefully we can generate a new implementation report with minimal > effort. So, I made a sample implementation report [1] using an in-browser test runner based on Ms2ger's earlier work (see public-test-infra for more details). The browsers are those that happened to be on my computer. I don't intend for anyone to take these results as authoritative, and more work is needed, but it is much better than editing a wiki. And has revealed yet more bugs in the tests. In time we can use this approach in collaboration with vendors to fully automate generating implementation reports. [1] http://hoppipolla.co.uk/410/workers.html
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 16:20:44 UTC