Re: Refactoring SharedWorkers out of Web Workers W3C spec

On 12/12/13 16:20, James Graham wrote:
> On 12/12/13 15:13, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> On 12/11/13 8:42 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> [IR] <>
>> Looking at this link, there are passes marked for obviously incorrect
>> tests (e.g. see
>> which says that
>> should fail in any conformant UA, but it's marked as passing in Opera
>> and Chrome.
>> So presumably we will need to rerun the tests in all UAs again once all
>> the bugs have been fixed, yes?
> Yes. I have found another couple of trivial bugs in the tests which I
> will fix up. I will also have a got at fixing Ms2ger's test runner to
> work in a better way, sort out some way to automate the visual output,
> and hopefully we can generate a new implementation report with minimal
> effort.

So, I made a sample implementation report [1] using an in-browser test 
runner based on Ms2ger's earlier work (see public-test-infra for more 
details). The browsers are those that happened to be on my computer. I 
don't intend for anyone to take these results as authoritative, and more 
work is needed, but it is much better than editing a wiki. And has 
revealed yet more bugs in the tests.

In time we can use this approach in collaboration with vendors to fully 
automate generating implementation reports.


Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 16:20:44 UTC