- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:18:38 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
- cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, piranna@gmail.com wrote: > > > > - Canvas in Workers > > There's been various proposals, including one in the spec that hasn't > > met with implementor approval; I'm waiting for something to get > > traction amongst the competing proposals. > > > > - Being clearer about what features are visible in workers > > Blocked on: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22646 > > I have proposed several times about allowing to create PeerConnection > and DataChannel objects from inside a Worker, don't know if that request > falls into the "what features are visible " topic or if it's a special > case like the canvas... > > https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/discuss-webrtc/-bOW_hhs28E It's in the "what features are visible" topic, unless there's anything specific about the API that needs changing in workers. As far as the WebRTC stuff goes, though, I'll let the WebRTC group decide what should happen. The issue of being clearer about what features are visible in workers is mostly about getting some IDL-level keyword that we can use to make it easier to specify (right now it can be done but has to be done in prose, and I haven't been consistent about it in my specs). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 21:19:02 UTC