- From: Daniel Freedman <dfreedm@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:08:02 -0800
- To: Enrique Moreno Tent <enriquemorenotent@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAUAVAhJnv7uPtSW19TiVt0VcRVnzKJ8Tgcq7DkOQi_NUmFFEw@mail.gmail.com>
I've updated your pen with the other minor syntax changes that have occured in Chrome Canary: @host -> :host template.content.cloneNode(true) -> document.importNode(template.content) ::content p {} will always win over ::content {}, so I moved the black color to the style for p { } http://codepen.io/anon/pen/tcjeh On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Enrique Moreno Tent < enriquemorenotent@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you all! Finally I understand how it works :) > > I made a small pen to illustrate this better > http://codepen.io/dbugger/pen/Hyihd > > > On 1 December 2013 23:35, Daniel Freedman <dfreedm@google.com> wrote: > >> ::content is behind the "Experimental Web Platform Features" chrome flag, >> along with the unprefixed createShadowRoot. >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Enrique Moreno Tent < >> enriquemorenotent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I have actually have gotten to work with ":-webkit-distributed(p)" but >>> as I read it has been deprecated and ":content p" should work (but it >>> doesnt). >>> >>> Do I need maybe to activate a flag? Im using Chrome 31 under Ubuntu, in >>> case it matters. >>> >>> >>> On 28 November 2013 18:39, Enrique Moreno Tent < >>> enriquemorenotent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you :) But it is quite confusing to understand how it works. I >>>> have tried to update my example, but still doesn't seem to work. Could you >>>> tell me, in my example, what would be the selector? I tried "p::content", >>>> but as you see that doesnt seem to work. >>>> >>>> My use case example, again, is here: >>>> http://codepen.io/dbugger/pen/Hyihd >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28 November 2013 09:58, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah, Chrome has already implemented that. I've implemented that. :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Enrique Moreno Tent < >>>>> enriquemorenotent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Oh, interesting! Has this been implemented in any browser? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 28 November 2013 08:46, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We can use '::content' pseudo elements if we want to apply styles to >>>>>>> distributed nodes from a shadow tree. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See >>>>>>> http://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/#content-pseudo-element >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Enrique Moreno Tent < >>>>>>> enriquemorenotent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, I have been experimenting with Web Components and I have an >>>>>>>> issue, which I think I have represented fairly clear here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (Tested on Chrome) >>>>>>>> http://codepen.io/dbugger/pen/Hyihd >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I understood correctly, one of the points of web components is >>>>>>>> to control the presentation of our component. That is why we have the >>>>>>>> Shadow Boundary. BUT what happens with the elements that are represented >>>>>>>> with <content>? They are not considered part of the shadow, therefore the >>>>>>>> styles that the author decides to apply on them, will "invade" the Web >>>>>>>> Component. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any thought on this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Enrique Moreno Tent, Web developer >>>>>>>> http://enriquemorenotent.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Hayato >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Enrique Moreno Tent, Web developer >>>>>> http://enriquemorenotent.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Hayato >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Enrique Moreno Tent, Web developer >>>> http://enriquemorenotent.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Enrique Moreno Tent, Web developer >>> http://enriquemorenotent.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Enrique Moreno Tent, Web developer > http://enriquemorenotent.com >
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 00:08:49 UTC