- From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:21:59 -0800
- To: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>
- Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-id: <69D62FC3-1CDF-4516-9D9D-E27B7EAA2EEA@apple.com>
On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote: > Given that many important/natural use cases of custom elements involve shadow DOM, > can we add a flag to auto-create shadow DOM for custom elements? > > In particular, can we add "template" as the third argument to document.register so that > when a custom element is "instantiated", the specified template is automatically closed > and inserted into a shadow DOM of the custom element. > > > Can you explain the advantage of this? It saves one line of code: > > this.createShadowRoot().appendChild(document.importNode(template.contents)); > > I don't see how pushing that one line down into the browser is helping anyone. It'll be insane for force hundreds of thousands of authors to write that same line. > Supporting <template> in document.register is easily done in script, so I believe it's better left to developers as they're better at building frameworks than we are. Why would adding an optional argument to support the most common use case prevent developers from building frameworks? Also, I don't consider adding an optional argument to document.register not to force authors having to write the same boilerplate every time they use custom elements as "building frameworks" even if your promise, authors are better at building frameworks, were true. - R. Niwa
Received on Saturday, 7 December 2013 04:22:31 UTC