On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > > Even worse is the removal of the reference to the source specification, >> given that you know that this is a contentious subject in this WG. >> > > Both Travis and I supported keeping that information in the boilerplate. > The W3C Staff told us it must be removed before the LC could be published > as at TR. (FYI, I filed a related Issue against the TR publication rules < > https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/71>. I think the > public-w3process list is an appropriate place to discuss the Consortium's > publication rules.) > If that's the requirement from the Team to publish as TR, then I object to publishing as a TR until the requirements are fixed. If and when the publishing rules are fixed then we can consider proceeding again. The spec text as currently exists is actively harmful since it forks the living standard without even having a reference to it. - James
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 19:04:30 UTC