- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:47:08 +1100
- To: John Mellor <johnme@google.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Christiansen, Kenneth R" <kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013, at 23:32, John Mellor wrote: > > I definitely agree with that. Though, we should allow both syntaxes > > (array and string). > > If we want a more complex system later, we could move to that. For the > > moment, I think we should keep it simple. > > > It seems an even simpler option would be to simply omit viewport from the > manifest for now unless someone can provide a more compelling reason for > it > being there. I think those two options could live side by side. I guess on advantage of the manifest is that the orientation can be set once and would apply for the entire app. > How do the various UAs plan on avoiding a white flash of unpainted page > when launching web apps? One potential solution to the white flash might > be > to delay opening a window for the web app until first paint. In which > case, > you wouldn't want to rotate the system UI before launching your window > anyway... Interestingly, Chrome Apps is experimenting that: delaying showing new window until the first paint happens to prevent a white flash. It is only an experiment because there is the problem of the window not showing for a long time if the first paint takes a long time to happen. I think doing that on mobile would be easier because there is usually one window showing at a time so the user would understand that the app is being loaded. I'm a bit digressing though. -- Mounir
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 13:47:34 UTC