- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:46:21 -0500
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
No comments or bugs were submitted against the 31 October LCWD of Pointer Lock. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of the spec using the LCWD as the basis: <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-pointerlock-20131031/> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process Document <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs>. I propose 3 months as the minimal amount of time before we are ready to advance the spec to Proposed Recommendation and I propose we re-use the CR exit criteria we used for the IDB CR: [[ During the Candidate Recommendation period, which ends @T+3months, the WG will complete its test suite. Before this specification exits Candidate Recommendation, two or more independent implementations must pass each test, although no single implementation must pass each test. The group will also create an Implementation Report. ]] If anyone has feedback regarding features that could be marked "at risk", please speak up during this CfC. Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is December 9 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps @ w3.org. -Thanks, ArtB
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 11:50:38 UTC