- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:58:47 +0100
- To: James Greene <james.m.greene@gmail.com>
- Cc: Remi Grumeau <remi.grumeau@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
> 1. I'm not advocating for full scriptability, just basic support detection, > e.g.: > `if accepts("audio/ogg") ...` > Some kind of basic "scriptability" like the one on CSS, isn't it? Ok, it's good. > The main problem I'd see there is if the browser also needs to know what > plugins > (or even JS libs, I suppose) are capable of consuming. > More or less why I was going down the full Javascript path :-) > 2. AFAIK, using ServiceWorkers requires that the resources are > programmatically > fetched by the ServiceWorker. This is different than a manifest which is > capable > of figuring the cache out on the fly as resources are loaded. > Not really, ServiceWorker doesn't mandate that all resources go though it, but it's being showed as the main use case (not mine, I want to combine it with ProtocolHandler to create my own protocols and manage them on client-side...). > I'm not opposed to just punted and saying that ServiceWorker is the way to > deal > with this, though. I have no personal use cases at the moment for this > functionality... just playing devil's advocate for the OP. :) > Lol! Ok :-) -- "Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo Unix." – Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 18:59:34 UTC