OK, thanks, let's see what happens... Regards Aymeric Le 12/11/2013 09:54, Takeshi Yoshino a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com > <mailto:vitteaymeric@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Takeshi, > > See discussion here too: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/33 > > The problem with stop again is that I need to handle myself the > clone operations, the advantage of stop-eof is: > > - clone the operation > - close it > - restart from the clone > > And as I mentioned before this would work for any operation that > has unresolved bytes (TextDecoder, etc) without the need of > modifying the operation API for explicit clones or options. > > > OK. I understood your needs. > > As explained in the previous mail, if we decide to take in your > suggestion, I'd implement your stop-eof as a more generic in-band > control signal. In other words, changing the draft to propose message > stream than byte stream. > > I estimate that this feature sophisticates implementation much. So, I > want to hear more support and justification. > > For now, I filed a bug to track discussion. > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23799 -- Peersm : http://www.peersm.com node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2013 13:02:35 UTC