[Bug 16312] use of undocumented 'switch' convention for rule formulation is ambiguous from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org on 2013-11-07 (public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:39:18 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-16312-2927-MLrzp6QR2q@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16312

Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #6 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> ---
So I don't like you closing these bugs. Should we get a separate WHATWG
XMLHttpRequest component? There's an outstanding question in comment 4 and
there's indeed room for confusion, even though we use the pattern a lot.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 14:39:23 UTC