- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:17:01 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23726 Bug ID: 23726 Summary: Integration between XMLHttpRequest and Streams API Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Streams API Assignee: tyoshino@google.com Reporter: tyoshino@google.com QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org Current ED tries to support upload-with-Stream usage by making send() to accept a Stream as its argument. We can also choose to let XHR provide a WritableByteStream. For example, if we can make send() to return a WritableByteStream, it'll be streamForUpload = xhr.send(); source.pipe(streamForUpload); Current extension approach is easy. But maybe now we should revisit this and discuss which is better not only about XHR but for each API and if possible figure out good practice in general. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 17:17:06 UTC