RE: CfC: publish WD of Streams API; deadline Nov 3

Yes, WebSockets was missing - I've gone ahead and updated the spec to include it.

Thanks for sharing the links, the content is well thought out. In particular, your diagram does a good job summarizing some of the key consumers and producers that come to play regarding Streams. I'll review it in detail.

DataChannels also seem like a possible candidate, although I'm not yet very familiar with them. This can be something reviewed and thought through, and added accordingly.

> Who is coordinating each group that should get involved? MediaStream for example should be based on the Stream interface and all related streams proposals.

Once we come to a consensus in the WG what Streams look like and their role, we can begin to coordinate what the impact is on other groups.

Thanks,
Feras


----------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:05:22 +1100
> From: robman@mob-labs.com
> To: public-webapps@w3.org
> Subject: Re: CfC: publish WD of Streams API; deadline Nov 3
>
> Along with WebSockets as Aymeric mentioned...WebRTC DataChannels are
> also missing.
>
> And I think Aymeric's point about MediaStream is important too...but
> there is very strong push-back from within the Media Capture & Streams
> TF that they don't think this is relevant 8/
>
> Also, here's a couple of links for things I've shared/proposed recently
> related to this.
>
> public message
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013Sep/0229.html
>
> presentation
> http://www.slideshare.net/robman/web-standards-for-ar-workshop-at-ismar13
>
> code
> https://github.com/buildar/getting_started_with_webrtc#image_processing_pipelinehtml
>
>
> All thoughts and feedback welcome.
>
>
> roBman
>
>
> On 29/10/13 10:22 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>> I have suggested some additions/changes in my latest reply to the
>> Overlap thread.
>>
>> The list of streams producers/consumers is not final but obviously
>> WebSockets are missing.
>>
>> Who is coordinating each group that should get involved? MediaStream
>> for example should be based on the Stream interface and all related
>> streams proposals.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Aymeric
>>
>> Le 28/10/2013 16:29, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
>>> Feras and Takeshi have begun merging their Streams proposal and this
>>> is a Call for Consensus to publish a new WD of Streams API using the
>>> updated ED as the basis:
>>>
>>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm>
>>>
>>> Please note the Editors may update the ED before the TR is published
>>> (but they do not intend to make major changes during the CfC).
>>>
>>> Agreement to this proposal: a) indicates support for publishing a new
>>> WD; and b) does not necessarily indicate support of the contents of
>>> the WD.
>>>
>>> If you have any comments or concerns about this proposal, please
>>> reply to this e-mail by November 3 at the latest. Positive response
>>> to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed
>>> to mean agreement with the proposal.
>>>
>>> -Thanks, ArtB
>>>
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 05:44:05 UTC