- From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:48:17 +0900
- To: 'public-webapps' <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: 'Hallvord Steen' <hsteen@mozilla.com>, 'Julian Aubourg' <j@ubourg.net>
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:40 AM > > I am also interested in the status and plans for both the version of XHR > that is supposed to move to LC->CR-REC in 2013 and the XHR-Bleeding-Edge > version. > As planned, we editors prepared XMLHttpRequest Level 1 [1] as a Recommendation track version. Initially, we'd planned to put together a draft with only the parts that are *already compatibly* supported across the major implementations, but it turned out that most of the major features are showing *subtle differences* in behavior. Hence, we'd rather endeavored to secure wider test coverage [3] and analyzed the compatibility issues [4] (underway). From this point on, we plan to make efforts in resolving these compatibility issues and move the spec forward to LC(within this year)-CR-REC. The only features left out - due to lack of implementation or maturity - are: - data: URLs - responseType "json" - anonymous flag and XMLHttpRequestOptions dictionary For the bleeding-edge version [2], we need further discussion in direction as Anne recently revised the WHATWG spec [5] in terms of Fetch spec [6]. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/xhr-1/Overview.html [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html [3] http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/XMLHttpRequest/ [4] http://jungkees.github.io/XMLHttpRequest-test/ [5] http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org [6] http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org -- Jungkee Song
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 12:48:46 UTC