- From: David Rajchenbach-Teller <dteller@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:34:40 +0200
- To: James Greene <james.m.greene@gmail.com>
- CC: David Bruant <bruant.d@gmail.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, piranna@gmail.com, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Andrea Marchesini <amarchesini@mozilla.com>
On 10/13/13 4:21 PM, James Greene wrote: >> a) is necessary, but for b) it is sufficient for the sync thread to be >> able to sleep until a condition/mutex/... is lifted > > In other words, your clarification is completely true but my initial > statement was written with regard to client-side JavaScript, which > cannot sleep. As such, I believe my original assertions are still > correct with regard to writing a sync wrapper in JS. My apologies, I had obviously misunderstood your initial statement. I was thinking of an extension of the Worker API and how to implement it at little CPU/battery clost. Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 09:35:07 UTC