Re: [webcomponents]: Allowing text children of ShadowRoot is a bad time from Anne van Kesteren on 2013-10-10 (public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:06:06 +0200
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Tab Atkins <tabatkins@google.com>, Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78iu6+d2XstGkKKRao_UyFXmaNmytHMNZS5KzBBrzWoWnQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> Maybe it's time to reconsider if ShadowRoot should be an element rather than
> a DocumentFragment again?

Either that or let it have its own node type if it's going to be
incompatible with DocumentFragment in terms of behavior. Alternatively
we could add more hidden state such as "host" which we added for
<template>, but that's not exactly great.

-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 08:06:33 UTC