- From: Brian Matthews (brmatthe) <brmatthe@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 23:57:06 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 10/4/13 7:54 AM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote: >On 10/4/13 10:48 AM, Kyle Huey wrote: >> If a File object (which has a name) is used instead of a Blob I think we >> should treat it as if something like "Content-Disposition: >> filename=$file.name <http://file.name>" was specified in an HTTP >> request. > >Gecko does, because a bunch of servers send it. See >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272541 > >And we support it by treating it identically to "Content-Disposition: >inline; filename=whatever". Which is how I believe named Blobs should >be handled. I'd agree, but they don't seem to be now (I think, I need to do some testing). I'll come up with a test case and write some bugs if necessary. Thanks, Brian
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 23:57:44 UTC