Re: Regarding: Making the W3C Web SQL Database Specification Active

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> 2. *Two* independent, production quality, database implementations
> being willing to implement exactly that SQL dialect. Not a subset of
> it, and not a superset of it.
>

This is an overstatement.  It's not required that there be two
implementations of something that are exactly the same, match the spec
exactly, with no experimental features, no unimplemented features and no
known bugs.  That's not how development of features on the Web works.

-- 
Glenn Maynard

Received on Saturday, 28 September 2013 03:05:49 UTC