- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:21:43 +0100
- To: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
- Cc: Michael Fitchett <michael.fitchett@spotsync.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Friday, September 27, 2013 at 3:07 PM, piranna@gmail.com wrote: > I agree with Marcos. Also, I thinks IndexedDB fits better as a > Javascript database working in a pure object oriented way. I don't > think WebSQL it's absolutely bad, relational databases usually are > easier to work with, but a NoSQL one can be more efficient. I would go > for improve IndexedDB and if so, develop a SQL database on top of it > (it would only need just the SQL parser) as a javascript library, so > you could get the best of both worlds and also merge queries and > results in both ways (SQL and NoSQL) over the same database and data. > yeah, that would be nice. Given how low level IDB is, I'd be surprised if someone hadn't already tried to do this. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 15:22:19 UTC