- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:35:37 -0700
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:32 PM, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >> Regardless of what they assumed, there's presumably a case to handle >> older browsers that don't support it at all. If the scripts guessed >> wrongly about what the unprefixed name would be, then they'll fall >> into this case anyway, which should be okay. >> >> If they didn't support down-level browsers at all, then they're >> already broken for a lot of users, so making them broken for a few >> more shouldn't be a huge deal. ^_^ > > I can't name any currently-used mobile browser that doesn't ship with a *MatchesSelector function. The "drop it" proposal is to break code for the sake of breaking code. Read the thread more closely - as always, we only suggest dropping prefixed variants *if possible*. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 16 September 2013 20:36:25 UTC