- From: JOY DOMINIC PREMKUMAR B <premjoy@tataelxsi.co.in>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:38:04 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Thank you for the response. > we have nobody interested in doing that thus far Should I log this request somewhere to track further? ________________________________________ From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [annevankesteren@gmail.com] on behalf of Anne van Kesteren [annevk@annevk.nl] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:47 PM To: JOY DOMINIC PREMKUMAR B Cc: public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: [XHR2] FormData in responseType On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:57 AM, JOY DOMINIC PREMKUMAR B <premjoy@tataelxsi.co.in> wrote: > Similar to FormData in XHR.send(), can we have FormData in > XHR.responseType.. This is useful in a scenario where server sends > multipart/form-data (or) multipart/mixed as response with mix of text and > binary data to client. When XHR.responseType is set to FormData, we've > response FormData available in the client JavaScript. 1) FormData is write-only. We'd have to change that first. (There are plans, but I haven't thought it through yet.) 2) We'd need to way more carefully define multipart/form-data if the browser is to implement a parser for it. We need to do that anyway (serializer is underdefined too), but we have nobody interested in doing that thus far. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 08:39:18 UTC