- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks.
>>
>> Done. Spec now sez:
>> "Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification [WebIDL], as this specification uses that specification and terminology."
>>
>
>
> Whoops. Seems I misunderstood. The spec actually now says:
> "The IDL blocks in this specification are conforming IDL fragments as defined by the WebIDL specification."
Thanks, indeed the CR->PR transition was made with a test suite that was
linked to this WebIDL reference, and not the other one.
That said, if you have tests and better, a report for a stricter
conformance to WebIDL, it would be good to highlight them.
Cheers,
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 12:07:07 UTC