On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three > > > conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. > > > > > > Could > > > "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming > > > interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? > > > (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Sure, I can add that if you think it will be helpful. > > Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. Done. Spec now sez: "Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them in a manner consistent with the ECMAScript Bindings defined in the Web IDL specification [WebIDL], as this specification uses that specification and terminology." -- Marcos CaceresReceived on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 16:47:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:12 UTC