- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:45:38 -0400
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 7/29/13 4:15 PM, ext Yves Lafon wrote: > Hi, > In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the > three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. > > Could > "This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming > interfaces." be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? > (likely 'Conforming IDL Fragments' per reading of the spec). Hi Yves - it's unfortunate that spec wasn't more clear on its WebIDL conformance but, yes, my recollection is that the implementors of that spec focused on conformance to the IDL fragments (and not the other conformance classes). -AB > Thanks, > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-widgets-apis-20120522/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#conformance >
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 20:46:16 UTC