- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 20:18:08 -0400
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. Changed "Fetch" references. The CR document referenced the WHATWG Fetch > spec in a number of places. This was problematic due to the maturity / > stability requirements of the W3C for document advancement, and I feel also > inappropriate, as the current Fetch spec positions itself as a successor to > CORS, not a reference in terms of which CORS is defined. Pretty sure CORS didn't reference the Fetch Standard. Given that the Fetch Standard is written after I wrote CORS, that would be somewhat improbable. > 8. In response to thread beginning at: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2013Feb/0078.html, > added 204 as a valid code equivalent to 200 for the CORS algorithm. I think implementations are moving towards allowing the whole 200-299 range. (Fetch Standard codifies that, at least.) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2013 00:18:36 UTC