- From: Daniel Cheng <dcheng@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:07:43 -0700
- To: James Greene <james.m.greene@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
The problem is backwards compatibility. There are sites that use the copy/cut event handler, and the proposal reverses the behavior. Suppose it were implemented: On older browsers: You must call event.preventDefault() in order for your changes to be written to the clipboard. On newer browsers: You must NOT call event.preventDefault() in order for your changes to be written to the clipboard. This transition would be extremely confusing, even if the proposal does seem more intuitive =/ Daniel On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:20 PM, James Greene <james.m.greene@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, I think this makes total sense. A common example might be to add > your page's URL, copyright notice, etc. to the end of whatever text the user > has selected WITHOUT having to query the Selection/Range APIs to [hopefully] > retrieve their selected text. > > I am discouraged, however, to see someone who works for a browser vendor > lamenting that doing it in what is likely the "right way" may be impossible > because a number of browser vendors have already implemented the > functionality. To me, it doesn't really seem like adding this new behavior > would negatively affect the current APIs at all as no one is expecting to > have that data provided on the Event right now; the only real change here is > in the browser internals, and consumers can take advantage of such by > eliminating their current Selection/Range queries once the Event is > providing that data on their behalf. > > As someone who is not a browser vendor employee, this sounds very doable. > ;) > > Sincerely, > James Greene > > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Cheng <dcheng@google.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net> >> wrote: >> > Is there any reason to justify the requirement to populate before the >> > dragstart? >> >> My guess is that it's a convenience for authors to be able to modify >> the content from the default easily. >> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen >> <hallvord@opera.com> wrote: >> > Regarding the question: I'm not sure what exactly you're asking for with >> > "something similar" and what effect it would have. Is it about reading >> > from >> > clipboard (for example, since you mention DnD of files, like reading >> > pasted >> > file references in a paste event)? Writing to the clipboard? Is there >> > any >> > change the clipboard spec should make to make pasting files/folders >> > easier >> > to implement? If yes, how and why? >> >> My original idea is that prior to dispatching a copy/cut event, run >> "if there is a selection, place the contents of the selection in the >> data store", then dispatch the copy/cut event. >> >> If the copy/cut event is not cancelled, then: >> - Write the data store to the clipboard. >> >> If the copy/cut event is cancelled: >> - Do nothing. The data store is discarded and the changes are not >> written to the clipboard. >> >> Unfortunately, this is completely opposite of how it's handled today >> by Firefox/Chrome/Safari so I don't think we can do this. Oh well. >> >> Daniel >> >
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 20:08:50 UTC