- From: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:21:03 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 2.7.2013 18:03, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Bronislav Klučka > <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com> wrote: >> On 2.7.2013 17:28, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Bronislav Klučka >>> <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com> wrote: >>>> 2/ change of part attribute from DOMString to DOMTokenList >>> This sounds all right. part='' is already class-like, since multiple >>> elements can have the same part='' value. The example at your page is >>> pretty compelling about this ability's usage. I guess ::part() would >>> also expand to taking a list of idents. >> Why would it? We have established convention for AND operator >> .class1.class2 >> would became >> ::part(node-checked)::part(node-selected) >> >> and for OR operator >> .class1, .class2 >> would became >> ::part(node-checked), ::part(node-selected) >> >> :matches(.class1, .class2) >> would became >> :matches(::part(node-checked), ::part(node-selected)) > Oh, no no no. ::part() is not a pseudo-class, it's a pseudo-element - > it points to a brand new element, rather than filtering the one you've > got. The fact that part='' is acting like class='' notwithstanding, > using ::part() like would be an abuse of the syntax. If we want to > support this, it has to be through something like "::part(node-checked > node-selected)". > > As an example of why violating the syntax model is a bad idea, this > directly conflicts with your desire to surface the ::part()s of nested > components - the thing that exposes them might be exposed as a > ::part() as well, so you need to be able to chain off of an existing > ::part(), like "x-video::part(controls)::part(play-button)" (assuming > the controls were actually implemented by another component nested > inside the <x-video> shadow tree). > > ~TJ > And back to x-video::part(controls)::part(play-button) example how it would be different from x-video ::part(controls) ::part(play-button) or this wouldn't be possible? the only possibilities being ::part(play-button) or ::part(controls)::part(play-button) or x-video::part(controls)::part(play-button) Brona
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 16:21:28 UTC