Sunday, 30 June 2013
Thursday, 27 June 2013
Wednesday, 26 June 2013
- Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Registration for TPAC 2013 is Open
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 
Tuesday, 25 June 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: [webcomponents] Minutes from 21 June 2013 f2f meeting
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - Re: Namespacing Components
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 
Monday, 24 June 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - [webcomponents]: Shadow DOM + CSS = <3 Meeting Summary
 - Re: HTML imports and rendering
 - Re: HTML imports and rendering
 - Re: HTML imports and rendering
 - Re: Namespacing Components
 - Re: Namespacing Components
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - [webcomponents] Minutes from 21 June 2013 f2f meeting
 - Re: HTML imports and rendering
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: HTML imports and rendering
 - Re: HTML imports and rendering
 
Sunday, 23 June 2013
- HTML imports and rendering
 - Re: Web Component Element definition
 - Re: Web Component Element definition
 - Re: Web Component Element definition
 - Re: Web Component Element definition
 - Re: Web Component Element definition
 - Web Component Element definition
 
Thursday, 20 June 2013
Friday, 21 June 2013
- [gamepad] Re: spec status (redux)
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
Thursday, 20 June 2013
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
- Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - [Bug 21136] Define Home key and Back key of Android smartphone
 - [Bug 21120] Define TV or A/V remote controller's keys
 - [Bug 21121] Define mobile phone related keys
 - [Bug 21137] Define key names for game controller of Android
 - [Bug 21083] Proposal key names for Android
 
Tuesday, 18 June 2013
Monday, 17 June 2013
- Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
 - [Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties
 
Sunday, 16 June 2013
Saturday, 15 June 2013
Friday, 14 June 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 - [Bug 22370] Inform script of corruption-induced data loss
 - [Bug 22370] New: Inform script of corruption-induced data loss
 - [cssom-view] Adding elementsFromPoint() to Document
 - Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
 - Re: Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Bringing other Web Components specs into HTML
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - [file-api] What's left before LCWD?
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 
Thursday, 13 June 2013
- RE: webappsec tests moved to GitHub
 - CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of Indexed Database; deadline June 20
 - Re: [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method
 
Wednesday, 12 June 2013
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - RE: Files on IndexedDB
 - RE: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 - Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Proposal for a filesystem API
 
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - [Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
 - [Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means.
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Considering an onincompleteload event
 - Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - [Bug 22130] Modification for IDBObjectStore's clear and delete method
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - Re: CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 - CfC: LCWD of HTML Templates; deadline June 18
 
Monday, 10 June 2013
- Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
 - Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
 - Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
 - Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
 - Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [selectors-api] QSA and findAll definitions
 
Sunday, 9 June 2013
Friday, 7 June 2013
- [Bug 21833] Under read* chaining during load event loadends should be suppressed
 - Re: inputmode attribute
 
Thursday, 6 June 2013
- Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
 - Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
 - Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
 - Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
 - Re: [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
 - [editing] Editing spec is no longer online
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - [css3-mediaqueries][css-device-adapt] Combining @viewport with the Fullscreen API
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 
Wednesday, 5 June 2013
- webappsec tests moved to GitHub
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
Monday, 3 June 2013
- [Bug 21725] Specify id for Step 1 of the Web Workers Processing Model
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
 - Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
 - Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - RE: [PUSH API] Scope of the specification
 - Re: [shadow-dom] spec markup
 - [html-templates] Seeking pre-LC comments for HTML Templates; deadline June 10
 - [PUSH API] Scope of the specification
 - [shadow-dom] spec markup
 - Re: [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
 - inputmode attribute
 
Sunday, 2 June 2013
- Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Fwd: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 
Saturday, 1 June 2013
Friday, 31 May 2013
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
 - Re: [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
 - [Bug 22228] New: Clarification of timeout attribute late overrides
 - [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
 - Re: [File Api]: How to Test <input type="file"> ?
 
Thursday, 30 May 2013
- Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
 - [File Api]: How to Test <input type="file"> ?
 - Re: [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
 - Re: [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
 - RE: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
 - RE: [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
 - Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
 - Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
 - RE: [IndexedDB] Is the spec ready to start a CfC for Last Call Working Draft?
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
 - Re: Files on IndexedDB
 - Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - [IndexedDB] Processing 16-May-2013 LC comments
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
 - Files on IndexedDB
 
Wednesday, 29 May 2013
- RE: Filesystem events
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - RE: Filesystem events
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - [webidl] Add a [Maplike] tag?
 - RE: Filesystem events
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - W3C Launches Patent Advisory Group for Push API
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - Re: Filesystem events
 - Filesystem events
 - Re: CfC: publish Widget Updates as a WG Note; deadline May 23
 - [Bug 22196] New: Clarification of InputMethodContext behavior when an element losts focus.
 - [Bug 22194] New: Clarificaiton of 'enabled' property behavior
 - Re: [editing] nested contenteditable
 - [Bug 21993] Change .getInputContext() to .inputMethodContext
 
Tuesday, 28 May 2013
- [editing] deletion and moving caret across stub and contenteditable=false elements (was: Re: [editing] nested contenteditable)
 - [editing] nested contenteditable
 - Re: [webcomponents]: First sketch of <element> element
 - Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
 - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [webcomponents] Interaction of shadow DOM, imports, base URIs
 - RE: [editing] nested contenteditable
 - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - RfC: 2nd Last Call of "Vibration API"; deadline June 13
 
Saturday, 25 May 2013
Thursday, 23 May 2013
- [Bug 19831] Investigate overrideMimeType()
 - Re: Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
- Re: The JavaScript context of a custom element
 - Face to Face on Shadow DOM and CSS interactions
 - Re: CfC - working on manifest
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Fetch: please review!
 - [Bug 16000] Trailers
 - [Bug 22130] New: Modification for clear and delete method
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 
Tuesday, 21 May 2013
- [webcomponents]: First sketch of <element> element
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: CfC: publish Widget Updates as a WG Note; deadline May 23
 - Re: CfC - working on manifest
 - Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 
Monday, 20 May 2013
- Re: The JavaScript context of a custom element
 - Re: The JavaScript context of a custom element
 - The JavaScript context of a custom element
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
 - Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 - Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
 - [Bug 22094] New: Add 'target' in InputMethodContext
 - [Bug 22093] New: Consider adding candidatewindowshow/update/hide events and getCandidateWindowClientRect()
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 - [IndexedDB] IDBRequest.onerror for DataCloneError and DataError
 - Re: [IndexedDB] request feedback on IDBKeyRange.inList([]) enhancement
 
Sunday, 19 May 2013
Friday, 17 May 2013
Saturday, 18 May 2013
- Re: Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 
Friday, 17 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - [Bug 19771] Need way to determine what keys are supported on device.
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 
Thursday, 16 May 2013
- CfC: publish Widget Updates as a WG Note; deadline May 23
 - RfC: LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline June 7
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - RE: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - RE: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - RE: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Overlap between StreamReader and FileReader
 - Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - RE: RE: [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
 - [Bug 16304] DONE != DONE
 - [Bug 22058] "error" event should fire before final readystatechange event
 - Re: RE: [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
 - [Bug 22059] New: Composition dictionary should be changed
 - [Bug 22058] New: "error" event should fire before final readystatechange event
 - [Bug 22057] New: Clarify InputMethodContext's scope in the spec
 - RE: [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
 - [XHR] readystatechange for multiple open calls
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Does "Abort this algorithm" mean "Abort transaction"?
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Does "Abort this algorithm" mean "Abort transaction"?
 - [IndexedDB] Does "Abort this algorithm" mean "Abort transaction"?
 
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
- Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 
Tuesday, 14 May 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - [webcomponents]: Declarative Custom Elements Take Umpteen, The Karate Kid Edition
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
 - Re: webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
 - RE: CfC - working on manifest
 - Re: CfC - working on manifest
 - RE: CfC - working on manifest
 - Re: CfC - working on manifest
 - Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
 - Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?
 - CfC - working on manifest
 - CfC: Face to face meeting on Components, 21 June
 - Kickoff application manifest work
 - Re: Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - [Bug 22028] New: Consider adding hasComposition() in InputMethodContext
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - webcomponents: <import> instead of <link>
 
Monday, 13 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: Re: [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
 - Re: Re: [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
 - Re: [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
 - [XHR] question about spec text and tests for double open() calls
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 - [Bug 22018] New: Consider adding getCompositionAlternatives() in InputMethodContext
 - A very preliminary draft of a URL spec
 
Friday, 10 May 2013
- Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: jar protocol
 - CfC: publish new WD of Shadow DOM; deadline May 11
 - Re: jar protocol
 - [Bug 21993] New: Change .getInputContext() to .inputMethodContext
 - [XHR.Bleeding-edge] ED update
 - [Bug 21992] New: Consider adding getInputContext() to SVGElement
 - Re: jar protocol
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 - Re: [IndexedDB] Inform script of corruption recovery
 - Re: CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
 - CfC: publish LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline May 16
 - Re: jar protocol
 
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Thursday, 9 May 2013
- Re: [IndexedDB] Is the spec ready to start a CfC for Last Call Working Draft?
 - Re: CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
 - [IndexedDB] Is the spec ready to start a CfC for Last Call Working Draft?
 
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - RE: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - CfC: Shelve Web Intents, Web Intents Addendum, Pick Media Intent, Pick Contacts Intent, respond by 17 May (next Friday) (resend)
 - Re: [Gamepad] spec status
 - Re: [Gamepad] spec status
 - Re: Web SQL and SQL
 - Re: Web SQL and SQL
 - Web SQL and SQL
 - Re: [XHR] anonymous flag
 - [XHR] anonymous flag
 - [D3E] Draft minutes from 7-May-2013 call [Was: Re: WebApps DOM3 Events Wiki page]
 - WebApps DOM3 Events Wiki page
 
Tuesday, 7 May 2013
- Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - RE: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Change of affiliation
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - jar protocol (was: ZIP archive API?)
 - Re: Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Manifest, Re: Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
 - Rough summary of minutes from the face to face
 - Re: Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - RE: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - RE: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 
Monday, 6 May 2013
- Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: Re: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - [Bug 21945] New: Does responseXML ever return an XMLDocument
 - Re: Re: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - RE: [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - [XHR] test nitpicks: MIME type / charset requirements
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 
Sunday, 5 May 2013
- Re: [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
 - Re: URL comparison
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 
Saturday, 4 May 2013
- Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 
Friday, 3 May 2013
- Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Re: Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Fetch: HTTP authentication and CORS
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - [pointerlock] Re: ACTION-678: Ask Vincent about next step for PointerLock (e.g. what needs to be done to go LC)
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 
Thursday, 2 May 2013
- Re: [selectors-api] References to Selectors 4
 - Re: [Gamepad] spec status
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - [Gamepad] spec status
 - W3C Brand Survey
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - prollyfill registry [Was: Re: URL comparison]
 - [Bug 21318] anon flag should be anonymous
 - Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
 - Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 
Wednesday, 1 May 2013
- Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Blob URLs | autoRevoke, defaults, and resolutions
 - Re: URL comparison
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - RE: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: URL comparison
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: URL comparison
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 
Tuesday, 30 April 2013
- [webcomponents]: Comprehensive update of Custom Elements spec
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - Re: ZIP archive API?
 - ZIP archive API?
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - [selectors-api2] Seeking implementation data re Selectors API Level 2
 - [quota-api] Seeking status and plans for Quota Mangement API
 - Re: CfC: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
 - Re: CfC: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
 - Prefer Error than exception for DataCloneError and DataError
 
Monday, 29 April 2013
- Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - [Bug 21555] Use of IDL arrays for keyPath values is underdefined
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
 - Re: Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - Re: Multiple Decorators
 - Re: Multiple Decorators
 - Multiple Decorators
 - Proposal for a DOM L3 Events Telecon
 - RE: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
 - [admin] WebApps' next f2f meeting is Nov 11-12 @ TPAC in Shenzhen China
 
Sunday, 28 April 2013
- Re: URL comparison
 - Re: Draft minutes: 26 April 2013 f2f meeting
 - Re: Draft minutes: 26 April 2013 f2f meeting
 
Saturday, 27 April 2013
- Re: URL comparison
 - Re: [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
 - CfC: publish new WD of Introduction to Web Components; deadline May 4
 - CfC: publish FPWD of HTML Imports; deadline May 4
 - CfC: publish FPWD of Custom Elements; deadline May 4
 - CfC: publish FPWD of UI Events; deadline May 4
 - CfC: publish Java bindings for WebIDL as a WG Note; deadline May 4
 - Draft minutes: 26 April 2013 f2f meeting
 
Friday, 26 April 2013
- [Bug 17681] [IndexedDB] Operations that raise multiple exceptions types should define order
 - [Bug 21801] [IndexedDB] Cursor operations when source deleted are not defined
 - [Bug 21836] Remove NotSupportedError on creating index for multiEntry index with array keyPath
 - [WebIDL] Bugs - which are for 1.0 and which are for Second Edition?
 - Draft minutes: 25 April 2013 f2f meeting
 - Draft minutes: 25 April 2013 f2f meeting
 - [Bug 21836] New: Remove NotSupportedError on creating index for multiEntry index with array keyPath
 
Thursday, 25 April 2013
- [Bug 21833] New: Under read* chaining during load event loadends should be suppressed
 - Re: [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - [Shadow DOM] Simplifying level 1 of Shadow DOM
 - Re: URL comparison
 - RE: URL comparison
 - Re: URL comparison
 - Re: Why not be multiEntry and array keyPath togather?
 - Proposal for a filesystem API
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Why not be multiEntry and array keyPath togather?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - URL comparison
 - Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
 
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
- RE: [IME] Preparing some feedback
 - [Bug 14364] appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
 - Re: Feedback about W3C Input Method Editor API draft
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - [screen-orient] why not provide at CSSOM API to CSS Device Adaptation instead?
 - Re: [admin] Call for Agenda topics for April 25-26 f2f meeting
 
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
- [Bug 21801] New: [IndexedDB] Cursor operations when source deleted are not defined
 - [PushAPI] New version of the Push API
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: Feedback about W3C Input Method Editor API draft
 - Critic [was: Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names]
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Feedback about W3C Input Method Editor API draft
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 
Monday, 22 April 2013
- RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - InedxedDB events : misconception?
 - Re: roadmap for inclusion of people with cognitive disabilities
 - Re: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
 - Re: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
 - RE: For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
 - For a deeper Indexed Database API (nested ObjectStores)
 - Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
 
Sunday, 21 April 2013
Saturday, 20 April 2013
Friday, 19 April 2013
- Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
 - [admin] Testing and GitHub login names
 - Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
 
Thursday, 18 April 2013
- Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Re: Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Collecting real world use cases (Was: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started)
 - Re: Futures and transactions
 - Re: DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
 - RfC: API portion of JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LCWD; deadline May 10
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 
Wednesday, 17 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - [webcomponents]: <element> Wars: A New Hope
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Update of the IME API spec working draft [call for comments]
 - Re: DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
 - Re: DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
 - DOM core changes wrt XML document properties
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - [Bug 21725] New: Specify id for Step 1 of the Web Workers Processing Model
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Using readyCallback for built-in elements, was: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Upload progress events and redirects
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Upload progress events and redirects
 - Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 
Monday, 15 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - [admin] Editors and Test Facilitators: please update your PubStatus data before April 25
 - [Bug 18551] [IndexedDB] Ambiguity about operations preceding a failed createIndex.
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - File API: auto-revoking blob URLs
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - [Bug 21649] Duplicate requirement
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Futures and transactions
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: Futures and transactions
 - Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: Futures and transactions
 
Sunday, 14 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 
Saturday, 13 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Does JS bound to <element> need to inherit from HTMLElement?
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 
Friday, 12 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - RE: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - MathML and "Clipboard API and events"
 - [webcomponents]: Of weird script elements and Benadryl
 - Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
 - Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
 - RE: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
 - [Bug 20045] data: URLs, HTTP, and parsing
 - Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
 - Re: [editing] Comments on WebKit addRange implementation
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 
Thursday, 11 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Blocking custom elements on ES6, was: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Blocking custom elements on ES6, was: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - [webcomponents]: Blocking custom elements on ES6, was: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
 - Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
 - Re: What will be the query language for IndexedDb
 - Re: RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
 - Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Class side inheritance in WebIDL (was Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax)
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - RfC: LCWD of API for Media Resources 1.0; deadline June 3
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - RE: What will be the query language for IndexedDb
 - What will be the query language for IndexedDb
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Fwd: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - [webcomponents]: Platonic form of custom elements declarative syntax
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - [Bug 21650] New: Require that XHR is available in workers
 - [Bug 21649] New: Duplicate requirement
 
Tuesday, 9 April 2013
- Re: [webcomponents]: Re-imagining shadow root as Element
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: [webcomponents]: de-duping in HTMLImports
 - Re: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
 - Re: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
 - Re: Futures and transactions
 
Monday, 8 April 2013
- Re: Screen Orientation API: Feedback
 - Futures and transactions
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: fixing appcache...
 
Sunday, 7 April 2013
Friday, 5 April 2013
- [editing] Comments on WebKit addRange implementation
 - Re: Reviewing test submissions
 - Re: File API: Blob.type
 - Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - Re: File API: Blob.type
 - Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - Re: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - RE: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - RE: [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - [webcomponents] self-documenting component.html files
 - Re: Update of the IME API spec working draft [call for comments]
 
Thursday, 4 April 2013
- [Bug 21584] FileReader.error should be nullable
 - [Bug 21585] New: Calling abort() when readyState != LOADING, Gecko throws an exception
 - [Bug 21584] New: FileReader.error should be nullable
 - Re: Reviewing test submissions
 - Re: Reviewing test submissions
 - Re: Reviewing test submissions
 - Re: Reviewing test submissions
 - Reviewing test submissions
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Move to GitHub: step 1 completed
 - [selectors-api] References to Selectors 4
 
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
- Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
 - RE: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
 - RE: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
 - Re: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
 - RE: Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
 - Re: File API: Blob.type
 - Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
 - Re: [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
 - [Bug 21559] [IndexedDB] Term "primary key" needs defining
 - [dom-futures] Making ProgressFuture use real events
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: Fixing appcache: a proposal to get us started
 - Re: fixing appcache...
 - Reminder: Please register for Face to face by Friday
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
 - Re: [webcomponents]: Scope of <link rel=components>, was: Naming the Baby
 - [Bug 21559] New: [IndexedDB] Term "primary key" needs defining
 
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
- Re: [IME] Preparing some feedback
 - Re: [indexeddb] spec for keyPath attributes is underdefined
 - [indexeddb] spec for keyPath attributes is underdefined
 - [Bug 21555] New: Use of IDL arrays for keyPath values is underdefined