Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Adam Klein <> wrote:
>> [Constructor(in MutationCallback callback)]
>> interface MutationObserver {
>>   void observe(in Node target, in MutationObserverOptions options);
>>   void disconnect();
>> };
> It would be nice to have both of these return the MutationObserver
> rather than void, so you can chain calls.

I don't think that makes sense for disconnect() (at least the version
specced here), since it stops observation of all nodes so chaining
wouldn't make sense.  But I definitely see that chaining observe could
be convenient.

- Adam

Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 23:46:33 UTC